Accessing live sports and ESPN content through its dedicated application generally necessitates a cable or satellite television subscription. This subscription typically authenticates user access to the applications live streams and on-demand video content. However, options exist for individuals seeking access to ESPN’s streaming platform independently of traditional pay-TV services.
The ability to bypass conventional television providers offers increased flexibility and potential cost savings for consumers interested in ESPN’s sports coverage. This approach empowers individuals to customize their entertainment consumption habits, selecting only the services and content that align with their specific interests and financial considerations. Historically, accessing premium sports content was contingent upon bundling with broader, often unwanted, television packages.
This article details the various pathways to stream ESPN content via its application, without a cable or satellite subscription. It will cover alternative streaming services, potential limitations, and essential considerations for prospective users seeking to navigate the evolving landscape of sports entertainment.
1. Streaming Service Subscriptions
Streaming service subscriptions represent a primary avenue for accessing the ESPN application without a traditional cable or satellite television subscription. These services function as intermediaries, providing access to live ESPN channels and associated content in exchange for a recurring fee. Their subscription models circumvent the need for conventional television provider contracts, offering a direct pathway to ESPN’s offerings.
-
Live Channel Access
Certain streaming services, such as Sling TV (Orange package), YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV, and FuboTV, include ESPN, ESPN2, and other ESPN networks in their channel lineups. These services authenticate user access to the ESPN application, unlocking live streams of these channels. Without these services, or a similar provider that includes ESPN, direct access to the live channels within the ESPN app remains unavailable.
-
Authentication Process
The authentication process involves the streaming service verifying the user’s subscription status with ESPN. When launching the ESPN application, users select their streaming provider from a list. They are then redirected to the provider’s website or application to enter their login credentials. Upon successful verification, the ESPN application grants access to live and on-demand content corresponding to the subscribed package.
-
Cost Considerations
The cost of streaming services offering ESPN varies. Factors influencing price include the number of channels included, simultaneous streaming allowances, and the availability of on-demand content. Consumers must weigh these costs against the value proposition of accessing ESPN channels in the absence of a traditional cable subscription. Bundling opportunities, such as mobile phone plans that include streaming subscriptions, may also influence the total cost.
-
Content Limitations
While streaming services unlock live ESPN channels within the application, certain content limitations may persist. These limitations can include regional blackouts of specific sporting events or restrictions on accessing certain on-demand content. Users should review the terms and conditions of their chosen streaming service to understand any geographical or content-related restrictions that may apply.
In summary, streaming service subscriptions offer a viable alternative to traditional cable television for individuals seeking access to the ESPN application and its associated content. However, careful consideration of authentication procedures, pricing structures, available content, and potential limitations is essential for selecting the most suitable option. This approach allows for a la carte sports viewing, tailored to individual needs and avoiding bundled packages.
2. ESPN+ limitations
ESPN+’s role is frequently misconstrued in the context of accessing the full breadth of content available through the ESPN application without a traditional TV provider. It serves as a complementary streaming service rather than a direct replacement for a cable or satellite subscription, leading to confusion among those seeking comprehensive access.
-
Limited Live Channel Access
ESPN+ does not provide access to the live, linear channels (ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews, etc.) that are typically available through a cable or satellite subscription. While ESPN+ offers a variety of live events, original programming, and on-demand content, it does not unlock the core ESPN channels within the ESPN application. This is a critical distinction for users seeking to watch live televised games or studio programming.
-
Content Complementarity, Not Substitution
The content on ESPN+ is largely supplemental to what is broadcast on the main ESPN networks. ESPN+ offers events that may not receive traditional television coverage, such as college sports, international soccer, and niche sports leagues. While valuable, this content does not replicate the programming found on the primary ESPN channels. Therefore, an ESPN+ subscription alone is insufficient for accessing the full spectrum of ESPN content without a pay-TV login.
-
Authentication Requirements Persist
Even with an ESPN+ subscription, access to certain features within the ESPN application often requires authentication through a separate cable, satellite, or streaming service that carries the linear ESPN channels. This means that users may still encounter prompts to log in with a TV provider, even if they are already paying for ESPN+. The authentication mechanism remains tied to traditional pay-TV models for accessing the live channels.
-
Implications for Cord-Cutters
For individuals attempting to cut the cord and rely solely on streaming services, understanding the limitations of ESPN+ is crucial. Assuming that ESPN+ provides full access to all ESPN content can lead to disappointment. Cord-cutters seeking complete access to ESPN’s offerings must explore alternative streaming services that include the linear ESPN channels, such as Sling TV, YouTube TV, or Hulu + Live TV, in addition to or instead of, an ESPN+ subscription.
The interplay between ESPN+ and the ESPN application highlights the fragmented nature of sports streaming. While ESPN+ expands the availability of sports content, it does not obviate the need for a qualifying pay-TV subscription to unlock the full potential of the ESPN app. Recognizing these limitations is paramount for consumers navigating the evolving landscape of sports entertainment and seeking strategies to watch ESPN without a traditional TV provider.
3. Standalone ESPN options
The concept of “standalone ESPN options,” in the context of accessing the ESPN application independently of a traditional television provider, requires careful examination. It implies the existence of subscription services that provide direct access to ESPN’s linear channels or a substantial subset thereof, without necessitating a bundled cable or satellite package. The availability, or lack thereof, of true standalone options directly dictates the strategies consumers must employ to utilize the ESPN application without a conventional TV subscription.
Currently, a completely standalone ESPN option, meaning a service offering the core ESPN channels (ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPNews) solely from ESPN itself, does not exist. ESPN+ provides supplemental content, but it does not unlock the live linear channels within the ESPN application. This absence forces individuals seeking access to these channels through the ESPN app to rely on third-party streaming services. These services, such as Sling TV, YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV, and FuboTV, offer packages that include ESPN’s linear channels alongside other networks. The consequence is that consumers are compelled to subscribe to a broader content package than solely ESPN, impacting cost and viewing habits. For example, an individual primarily interested in ESPN’s Monday Night Football must still subscribe to a package containing dozens of other channels, many of which may be unwanted.
Therefore, the understanding of “standalone ESPN options” is essentially an understanding of limited direct options. The present reality necessitates leveraging alternative streaming platforms for accessing the ESPN application’s full capabilities. As the media landscape continues to evolve, the emergence of a genuine standalone ESPN subscription remains a possibility. However, until such an option materializes, consumers must carefully evaluate the cost and content offerings of existing streaming services to determine the most suitable pathway for accessing ESPN content via its application. The primary challenge lies in balancing cost-effectiveness with the desired breadth of sports coverage, given the absence of a dedicated, direct ESPN subscription for core channels.
4. Bundling opportunities
Bundling opportunities significantly influence the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of utilizing the ESPN application without a traditional television provider. These bundles, often combining streaming services with other products or services, can represent a viable means to access ESPN content without subscribing to a traditional cable or satellite package. The value proposition of these arrangements necessitates careful evaluation to determine alignment with individual viewing preferences and financial constraints.
-
Mobile Phone Plans with Streaming Subscriptions
Certain mobile phone providers offer bundled packages that include subscriptions to streaming services, such as Disney+ or Hulu, which, in turn, can be bundled with ESPN+. While ESPN+ does not provide access to live ESPN channels within the ESPN application, it expands the available on-demand and exclusive content. The aggregate cost of a mobile phone plan coupled with a streaming bundle may be lower than subscribing to each service independently. However, potential subscribers must ascertain the specific content included in the bundle and its relevance to their ESPN viewing habits.
-
Internet Service Provider (ISP) Bundles
Some internet service providers offer bundled packages that incorporate streaming services as part of their service offerings. These bundles may include access to streaming platforms that carry live ESPN channels, such as YouTube TV or Hulu + Live TV. By combining internet service with a streaming package, consumers may achieve cost savings compared to subscribing to each service separately. However, the terms and conditions of such bundles, including data caps and promotional pricing, warrant careful scrutiny.
-
Hardware Bundles
Occasionally, manufacturers of streaming devices, such as Roku or Amazon Fire TV, offer bundled packages that include subscriptions to streaming services. These promotions provide an opportunity to acquire both a streaming device and access to ESPN content at a reduced price. However, consumers should assess whether the included subscription aligns with their specific needs and preferences, and consider the long-term costs of the streaming service beyond the promotional period.
-
Credit Card Rewards Programs
Some credit card companies offer rewards programs that provide credits or discounts on streaming services. Utilizing these rewards programs to offset the cost of a streaming service that carries ESPN channels can effectively reduce the overall expense of accessing ESPN content through the application. However, the specific terms and conditions of these rewards programs, including eligibility requirements and redemption processes, should be carefully reviewed to determine their practical value.
In conclusion, bundling opportunities present diverse pathways for accessing ESPN content through the application without a traditional television provider. However, effective utilization of these bundles necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of content offerings, pricing structures, terms and conditions, and individual viewing preferences to ensure alignment with overall entertainment needs and budgetary considerations. The integration of various services highlights the evolving entertainment landscape.
5. Authentication protocols
Authentication protocols are fundamental to accessing the ESPN application without a traditional television provider. These protocols dictate the verification process that confirms a user’s eligibility to view content, particularly live streams of ESPN’s linear channels. The absence of a cable or satellite subscription necessitates reliance on alternative authentication methods, often involving streaming services or other qualified providers.
-
TV Provider Authentication
Traditionally, accessing the ESPN app’s live streams required authenticating through a participating television provider. This process involved entering login credentials associated with a cable or satellite subscription, which then granted access to the app’s live content. The authentication protocol, typically SAML or OAuth-based, verified the user’s subscription status with the TV provider and authorized access to the ESPN streams. Without a valid TV provider login, accessing these streams remained restricted.
-
Streaming Service Authentication
The rise of streaming services like Sling TV, YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV, and FuboTV introduced a new authentication pathway. These services, which offer packages including ESPN’s linear channels, provide their own authentication credentials. When launching the ESPN app, users select their streaming provider from a list and enter their respective login details. The app then verifies the user’s subscription with the streaming service, granting access to live content contingent upon a valid subscription. The authentication protocols remain similar to those used with traditional TV providers but are managed by the streaming service.
-
ESPN+ Authentication
ESPN+ operates on a separate authentication model. While an ESPN+ subscription unlocks access to exclusive content within the ESPN app, it does not grant access to the live linear channels (ESPN, ESPN2, etc.) typically requiring a cable or streaming provider authentication. The ESPN+ authentication process verifies the user’s ESPN+ subscription status, enabling access to the service’s specific content library but not bypassing the need for a separate TV or streaming provider login for live channels.
-
Bypass Attempts and Unofficial Methods
Unofficial methods attempting to circumvent authentication protocols are generally unreliable and often violate terms of service. These methods may involve sharing login credentials or utilizing unauthorized streaming services, which can lead to account suspension or legal repercussions. Reliance on legitimate authentication pathways, either through a TV provider or a qualified streaming service, remains the only secure and authorized means of accessing the ESPN app’s full range of content.
In summary, authentication protocols are the gatekeepers to accessing ESPN app content without a traditional TV provider. The reliance on streaming service authentication, in lieu of a cable or satellite subscription, underscores the evolving media landscape. While ESPN+ offers a distinct content library with its own authentication, accessing the core ESPN channels within the app still necessitates a qualifying pay-TV or streaming subscription. The protocols ensure that only authorized users gain access, thereby protecting ESPN’s content distribution rights and revenue streams.
6. Regional restrictions
Regional restrictions pose a significant impediment to accessing content via the ESPN application, particularly for those seeking alternatives to traditional television providers. These restrictions, often termed “blackouts,” prevent the streaming of specific games or events within a designated geographical area. This is frequently due to pre-existing broadcasting agreements between ESPN and local television networks. For instance, a resident of a city hosting a Monday Night Football game may find the game blacked out on the ESPN app, as the local affiliate holds exclusive broadcasting rights within that market. This directly impacts the efficacy of strategies designed to bypass cable subscriptions, as even users with valid streaming service credentials may encounter content limitations based on their location.
The application of regional restrictions varies depending on the sport, league, and the specific streaming service utilized. Major League Baseball (MLB) blackout rules, for example, are notoriously complex, restricting the streaming of local team games within a team’s designated territory. This often extends to users outside the immediate city limits but still within the team’s defined broadcasting region. The National Basketball Association (NBA) and National Hockey League (NHL) also enforce blackout policies, albeit with variations in scope and implementation. Consequently, individuals attempting to stream these leagues’ games via the ESPN app, without a traditional cable subscription, must navigate a labyrinth of geographic limitations. Streaming services typically attempt to mitigate blackouts with various methods, such as providing alternative programming or offering out-of-market packages (at an additional cost), but these workarounds do not fully eliminate the impact of regional restrictions.
Understanding regional restrictions is paramount for individuals exploring “how to watch espn app without a tv provider.” The effectiveness of streaming service subscriptions hinges on an awareness of geographic limitations. Potential subscribers must research the blackout policies applicable to their region and preferred sports leagues to accurately assess the value of alternative streaming options. Failure to account for regional restrictions can result in a frustrating viewing experience, as anticipated games become unavailable due to geographic limitations, undermining the perceived benefits of bypassing a traditional cable subscription. Successfully navigating the sports streaming landscape demands a nuanced understanding of both authentication protocols and geographic constraints.
7. Device compatibility
Device compatibility represents a critical prerequisite for successfully accessing the ESPN application without a conventional television provider. The ability to stream content hinges on the availability of the ESPN app across a range of devices, impacting the flexibility and convenience of alternative viewing arrangements. Incompatibility can negate the benefits of cord-cutting, regardless of subscription status.
-
Smart Televisions and Streaming Devices
Many smart televisions and dedicated streaming devices (e.g., Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Apple TV) offer native ESPN app support. The availability of a dedicated app on these platforms simplifies access, allowing users to stream content directly on their television screens without additional hardware. Compatibility issues arise when older smart televisions lack support for newer app versions or when specific streaming devices do not offer an ESPN app. This necessitates verifying device compatibility before committing to a streaming service.
-
Mobile Devices (Smartphones and Tablets)
The ESPN app is widely available on iOS and Android smartphones and tablets. This facilitates mobile viewing, allowing users to access content on the go. However, device compatibility can be affected by operating system versions. Older devices running outdated operating systems may not support the latest app versions, preventing access to live streams or on-demand content. Regular app updates are essential for maintaining compatibility.
-
Web Browsers (Computers and Laptops)
Accessing the ESPN app through a web browser on a computer or laptop provides an alternative viewing option. However, browser compatibility is crucial. The ESPN website may not function optimally on all browsers, and browser extensions or ad blockers can interfere with streaming. Ensuring that the web browser is up-to-date and that any conflicting extensions are disabled is essential for reliable playback.
-
Gaming Consoles
Select gaming consoles, such as PlayStation and Xbox, offer ESPN app support. This allows users to stream content directly on their televisions through their gaming consoles. Compatibility is contingent upon the console model and operating system version. Older console models may lack ESPN app support, limiting access. Furthermore, subscription requirements for online gaming services may affect the ability to stream ESPN content on gaming consoles.
The interaction between device compatibility and the viability of “how to watch espn app without a tv provider” highlights the importance of a holistic approach. A valid streaming service subscription is insufficient without compatible devices. Careful consideration of device compatibility, operating system versions, and potential browser conflicts is essential for a seamless and reliable viewing experience, maximizing the benefits of alternative streaming arrangements.
8. Cost comparison
Evaluating the financial implications of accessing the ESPN application without a traditional television provider necessitates a detailed cost comparison. This assessment involves analyzing the expenses associated with alternative streaming services, hardware requirements, and potential hidden fees to determine the most economically viable solution.
-
Streaming Service Tiers
Streaming services offering ESPN’s linear channels typically operate on tiered pricing models. Basic packages may provide access to essential ESPN networks, while premium tiers include additional channels, enhanced features (e.g., simultaneous streams, DVR storage), and higher resolution video. Cost comparison necessitates identifying the tier that aligns with individual content needs and viewing habits. Premium tiers, while offering greater content breadth, significantly increase the monthly expense. Conversely, basic tiers may lack essential channels or features, necessitating trade-offs between cost and content.
-
ESPN+ vs. Bundled Services
ESPN+ presents a distinct cost consideration. While significantly cheaper than streaming services offering linear ESPN channels, its limited content scope necessitates supplemental subscriptions for comprehensive coverage. A cost comparison must account for the combined expense of ESPN+ and a streaming service providing live ESPN networks versus a bundled service encompassing both. Furthermore, potential savings from bundling streaming services with other products (e.g., mobile phone plans, internet service) should be factored into the analysis.
-
Hardware and Infrastructure Costs
Accessing the ESPN application requires compatible hardware, including smart televisions, streaming devices, or mobile devices. Cost comparison must incorporate the expense of acquiring or upgrading hardware, as well as potential infrastructure costs, such as increased internet bandwidth. Streaming high-definition video consumes significant data, potentially leading to overage charges for users with limited data plans. Evaluating hardware and infrastructure costs is crucial for accurately assessing the total financial burden of alternative streaming solutions.
-
Hidden Fees and Contractual Obligations
Certain streaming services impose hidden fees or contractual obligations that impact the overall cost. These may include cancellation fees, equipment rental charges, or promotional pricing that expires after a specified period. Furthermore, some services require annual contracts, limiting flexibility and potentially increasing long-term expenses. Cost comparison must account for these hidden fees and contractual obligations to determine the true cost of accessing ESPN content through alternative streaming providers.
Ultimately, a comprehensive cost comparison is essential for determining the economic feasibility of accessing the ESPN application without a traditional television provider. This analysis must encompass streaming service tiers, ESPN+ integration, hardware requirements, and potential hidden fees to identify the most cost-effective solution tailored to individual needs and viewing habits. These elements directly influence the success of any cord-cutting strategy.
9. Contractual obligations
The pursuit of accessing the ESPN application independently of traditional television providers necessitates a careful consideration of contractual obligations. These obligations, embedded within the terms of service of alternative streaming platforms, directly influence the accessibility, cost, and long-term viability of such strategies. The nature of these contracts dictates user rights, service guarantees, and potential penalties for non-compliance, thus serving as a cornerstone of the cord-cutting experience. For example, a streaming service may stipulate a minimum subscription period, rendering early cancellation costly. Similarly, bandwidth limitations imposed by internet service providers, often bundled with streaming packages, indirectly affect the quality and availability of ESPN streams, creating a contractual entanglement.
Practical implications of these contractual obligations are diverse. Subscribers may encounter limitations on simultaneous streams, restricting the number of devices that can access ESPN content concurrently. Data caps imposed by internet service providers can lead to service interruptions or overage charges if streaming consumption exceeds allotted bandwidth. Furthermore, streaming services retain the right to modify their terms of service, potentially altering channel lineups, pricing structures, or access protocols without prior notice. This inherent uncertainty underscores the need for diligent scrutiny of contractual agreements before committing to an alternative streaming solution for accessing ESPN content. Real-life examples include situations where a streaming service removes ESPN channels from its lineup mid-contract, forcing subscribers to either accept the altered service or incur cancellation fees to terminate the agreement.
In conclusion, contractual obligations exert a profound influence on the pursuit of accessing the ESPN application independently of traditional television providers. These obligations, encompassing subscription agreements, internet service terms, and potential bundling arrangements, shape the financial costs, accessibility parameters, and long-term viability of alternative streaming solutions. The successful navigation of the cord-cutting landscape necessitates a thorough understanding of contractual clauses, a proactive approach to monitoring service changes, and a willingness to adapt viewing habits to accommodate the inherent limitations and uncertainties embedded within these agreements. A comprehensive understanding prevents unexpected service disruptions or financial burdens, ensuring a sustainable and enjoyable viewing experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
This section addresses common inquiries regarding access to the ESPN application without a traditional cable or satellite subscription. It aims to provide clarity on alternative methods and potential limitations.
Question 1: Is it possible to watch live ESPN channels within the ESPN app without a cable subscription?
Yes, but a subscription to a participating streaming service is required. Services such as Sling TV, YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV, and FuboTV offer packages that include ESPN’s linear channels, thereby granting access to live streams within the app.
Question 2: Does an ESPN+ subscription provide access to live ESPN channels in the ESPN app?
No. ESPN+ is a separate streaming service that offers exclusive content but does not include access to the live, linear ESPN channels (ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, etc.) found within the main ESPN application. A separate subscription to a streaming service carrying those channels is necessary for live viewing.
Question 3: What alternative streaming services provide access to ESPN channels within the app?
Several streaming services offer ESPN channels as part of their packages. These include Sling TV (Orange package), YouTube TV, Hulu + Live TV, and FuboTV. The availability of specific ESPN channels may vary depending on the chosen package.
Question 4: Are there regional restrictions that may impact access to ESPN content, even with a streaming subscription?
Yes. Regional blackouts may prevent the streaming of certain games or events within specific geographical areas, even with a valid streaming subscription. These restrictions are often due to existing broadcasting agreements.
Question 5: How does the authentication process work when using a streaming service to access the ESPN app?
The authentication process involves selecting the chosen streaming provider within the ESPN app and then logging in with the streaming service credentials. The app then verifies the user’s subscription status, granting access to live content contingent upon a valid subscription.
Question 6: Are there legal or ethical concerns associated with sharing streaming service logins to access the ESPN app?
Sharing login credentials typically violates the terms of service of streaming providers and may be considered a breach of contract. Furthermore, unauthorized sharing can lead to account suspension or other penalties.
In conclusion, while alternative pathways exist for accessing the ESPN application without a traditional cable subscription, understanding the nuances of streaming service subscriptions, content limitations, and authentication protocols is crucial. Consumers should carefully evaluate their needs and research available options to determine the most suitable approach.
The subsequent section will summarize the key findings.
Tips for Accessing ESPN App Content Without a TV Provider
Strategic planning is essential for maximizing access to ESPN content through the application without a traditional cable or satellite television subscription. Understanding the nuances of streaming services and authentication processes is paramount.
Tip 1: Assess Content Needs Before Selecting a Streaming Service: The range of available streaming services varies considerably. Identifying desired ESPN channels and specific sporting events is crucial prior to subscribing. Certain services may offer more comprehensive coverage of preferred leagues, justifying a potentially higher monthly cost.
Tip 2: Verify Regional Blackout Restrictions: Regional blackouts can significantly limit access to live games. Research local blackout policies for preferred sports leagues to determine the extent of potential restrictions based on geographical location. Understanding these limitations informs service selection and expectation management.
Tip 3: Confirm Device Compatibility: Ensure compatibility between the chosen streaming service and the devices used for viewing. Streaming services often maintain lists of supported devices on their websites. Incompatibility can negate the benefits of a subscription, rendering the service unusable on preferred viewing platforms.
Tip 4: Evaluate Cost-Effectiveness of Bundling Options: Explore bundling opportunities that combine streaming services with other services, such as mobile phone plans or internet service. These bundles may offer cost savings compared to subscribing to individual services, but careful evaluation of content inclusion is necessary.
Tip 5: Scrutinize Contractual Terms and Conditions: Thoroughly review the terms and conditions of any streaming service subscription. Pay close attention to cancellation policies, data caps, promotional pricing expiration dates, and potential service limitations. Understanding these terms prevents unexpected costs or service disruptions.
Tip 6: Monitor Streaming Quality and Data Usage: High-definition streaming consumes significant data. Monitor data usage to avoid overage charges, particularly for users with limited data plans. Adjust streaming quality settings to balance visual fidelity with data consumption.
Tip 7: Leverage Free Trial Periods: Utilize free trial periods offered by streaming services to evaluate their performance and content offerings. This provides an opportunity to assess the service’s suitability prior to committing to a paid subscription.
Implementing these strategies ensures a cost-effective and streamlined approach to accessing ESPN content, mitigating potential frustrations associated with cord-cutting.
The following section provides a concise summary of the findings presented throughout this exploration.
Conclusion
This exploration has detailed the various methods for accessing the ESPN application without a traditional television provider. The assessment revealed that while a direct, standalone ESPN subscription for linear channels is currently unavailable, viable alternatives exist through streaming service subscriptions. These subscriptions offer access to live ESPN channels and on-demand content within the app, subject to regional restrictions, device compatibility, and authentication protocols. The cost-effectiveness of these alternatives hinges on a comprehensive evaluation of tiered pricing models, bundling opportunities, and potential hidden fees.
The evolving media landscape continues to reshape the accessibility of sports content. Individuals seeking to sever ties with traditional pay-TV providers must remain informed about the dynamic interplay between streaming services, content licensing agreements, and technological advancements. Continued vigilance and proactive adaptation are essential for navigating this complex environment and maintaining access to desired sports programming via the ESPN application. As rights evolve, the landscape will continue to change.
