The application process for undergraduate admission often requires prospective students to submit essays. Two common essay types are those submitted through the Common Application and those specifically requested by individual institutions, such as Penn State University. The Common Application essay is a general essay used for multiple college applications, while the essay for Penn State allows for a more tailored and specific response to the university’s prompt.
Submitting thoughtful and well-crafted essays is crucial in demonstrating a candidate’s writing ability, critical thinking skills, and personality. The Common Application essay offers broad flexibility in topic selection, enabling students to showcase a significant aspect of their background, identity, interest, or talent. Institutions like Penn State utilize their supplemental essays to assess a candidate’s specific interest in the university and their preparedness for its academic environment and offerings.
Understanding the distinct purpose and requirements of each essay type is essential for maximizing application impact. Key considerations include prompt interpretation, content selection, structural organization, and stylistic choices. Subsequent discussion will delve into the nuances between these two essay types, providing guidance on how to approach each effectively and strategically.
1. Prompt specificity
Prompt specificity significantly differentiates a Penn State personal statement from a Common App essay. The Common App provides a selection of broad prompts, inviting applicants to explore aspects of their background, identity, or an event that led to personal growth. The prompts are intentionally open-ended, enabling candidates to adapt existing essays or craft entirely new narratives with diverse content. In contrast, Penn State’s prompts are direct and targeted, frequently focusing on the applicant’s reasons for choosing Penn State, their intended major, or how their skills and experiences align with the university’s offerings. This precision necessitates a tailored response, specific to Penn State’s academic environment and values.
The impact of prompt specificity is evident in the content required for each essay. A successful Common App essay may discuss a personal challenge overcome, irrespective of its direct relevance to any particular institution. A strong Penn State essay, however, demands demonstrable knowledge of the university’s programs, research opportunities, or unique aspects of its campus culture. For instance, if Penn State’s prompt asks about intended major, the response should showcase understanding of specific courses, faculty, or research labs related to that field. A generic statement about a general interest in the subject area would be insufficient. This emphasis on institutional knowledge and focused argumentation underscores the importance of directly addressing the prompt’s precise stipulations.
Therefore, understanding and adhering to prompt specificity is vital for maximizing application effectiveness. Failing to acknowledge this distinction results in essays that are either too general for Penn State’s evaluation or misaligned with the Common App’s broader intent. By prioritizing a targeted, informed approach to the Penn State personal statement and a more broadly reflective approach to the Common App essay, applicants can significantly enhance the persuasive impact of their overall application package. The challenge lies in effectively adapting and tailoring narratives to meet the nuanced expectations of each application component, a skill critical to college admission success.
2. Audience Consideration
Audience consideration plays a pivotal role when composing application essays. The intended reader shapes the tone, content, and overall strategy of both the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement. Recognizing the distinct characteristics of each audience is crucial for maximizing the essay’s persuasive impact.
-
Common Application Readers: Holistic Review
The Common Application is sent to a diverse array of institutions, each employing a holistic review process. These readers, typically admissions officers representing a variety of academic disciplines, are looking for a general sense of the applicant’s character, writing ability, and potential contribution to a college community. The Common App essay should present a multifaceted view of the applicant, showcasing qualities valued across a broad spectrum of institutions. This necessitates a narrative that resonates with universal themes, such as perseverance, intellectual curiosity, or empathy. The audience is primarily interested in understanding the applicant as an individual, irrespective of a specific major or institutional fit.
-
Penn State Admissions: Institutional Fit
Penn State admissions officers, serving as the specific audience for the personal statement, are primarily concerned with assessing the applicant’s suitability for Penn State’s unique academic environment and institutional culture. These readers are looking for a clear demonstration of the applicant’s understanding of Penn State’s programs, values, and opportunities. The essay should explicitly articulate the applicant’s reasons for choosing Penn State, highlighting specific courses, research labs, or extracurricular activities that align with their academic and personal goals. The audience seeks evidence of the applicant’s informed decision-making process and a compelling rationale for their desire to attend Penn State.
-
Tone and Style Adaptations
Given the distinct audiences, the tone and style of each essay must be carefully calibrated. The Common App essay can adopt a more reflective and introspective tone, allowing for personal anecdotes and emotional expression. The Penn State personal statement, however, requires a more formal and analytical tone, emphasizing reasoned arguments and concrete examples. While creativity and originality are valued in both essays, the Penn State essay should prioritize clarity and directness in conveying the applicant’s intent and qualifications. The choice of language, narrative structure, and persuasive techniques should be tailored to resonate with the specific expectations of each audience.
-
Strategic Content Selection
Audience consideration dictates the strategic selection of content for each essay. The Common App essay can draw from a wider range of personal experiences, focusing on themes relevant to general personal growth and character development. The Penn State personal statement requires a more selective approach, prioritizing experiences and achievements that directly relate to the applicant’s academic interests and their potential contribution to the Penn State community. The content should be strategically chosen to address the specific concerns and expectations of the Penn State admissions officers, demonstrating a clear understanding of the university’s priorities and a commitment to its values. Focusing on these elements enhances the essay’s relevance and persuasive power.
Ultimately, the success of both the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement hinges on a thorough understanding of the intended audience. By carefully considering the perspectives, priorities, and expectations of each audience, applicants can craft essays that resonate with the readers and effectively convey their qualifications and potential. Failure to acknowledge the distinct audiences can result in essays that are misdirected, ineffective, and ultimately detrimental to the applicant’s chances of admission.
3. Content Tailoring
Content tailoring represents a critical divergence between the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement. The Common Application essay, intended for a broad spectrum of institutions, necessitates content with universal appeal, showcasing personal qualities applicable across diverse academic settings. In contrast, the Penn State personal statement demands content specifically aligned with the university’s programs, values, and opportunities. Failure to tailor content appropriately diminishes the essay’s impact on admissions committees.
The cause-and-effect relationship is readily apparent. Generic content, suitable for the Common Application, yields negligible results when submitted to Penn State. For example, an essay detailing a student’s volunteer experience, while commendable, lacks relevance if it fails to connect to Penn State’s specific community engagement initiatives or academic programs. Conversely, content that explicitly demonstrates a student’s understanding of Penn State’s undergraduate research opportunities, faculty expertise, or unique campus resources increases the likelihood of a favorable review. The practical significance lies in strategically selecting experiences and achievements that directly resonate with Penn State’s institutional priorities. This ensures the essay highlights the applicant’s potential contributions to the university, not merely showcasing general attributes. This targeted approach requires thorough research into Penn State’s offerings and a thoughtful reflection on how the applicant’s skills and interests align with those offerings.
In summary, content tailoring is not merely a stylistic preference but a strategic imperative. The Penn State personal statement demands content specifically aligned with the university’s unique characteristics, whereas the Common Application essay allows for broader, more universally appealing narratives. The challenge lies in effectively adapting the content to suit the specific requirements of each application component. By prioritizing content tailoring, applicants demonstrate their genuine interest in Penn State and significantly enhance the persuasive power of their application.
4. Length constraints
Length constraints represent a tangible distinction between the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement. The Common Application establishes a maximum word count, influencing the scope and depth of the narrative. This constraint compels applicants to prioritize concise expression and strategic storytelling, ensuring impactful communication within a defined boundary. Conversely, Penn State may specify a different word limit or page limit, requiring applicants to adjust their writing accordingly. The presence, absence, or variance in these constraints directly shapes the content, structure, and stylistic choices made by the applicant. Disregarding these limitations jeopardizes the overall quality and effectiveness of the submitted essay, potentially resulting in penalties during the evaluation process.
The practical significance of adhering to length constraints is exemplified by considering the consequences of exceeding prescribed limits. Overlong essays risk being truncated, leading to the omission of crucial information or arguments. Furthermore, exceeding limits signals a disregard for instructions and a lack of concision, qualities not favored by admissions committees. Conversely, essays significantly shorter than the permitted length may suggest a lack of effort or an inability to fully address the prompt. For instance, a Common Application essay with a 650-word maximum that is only 300 words risks failing to showcase the applicant’s personality and experiences adequately. Similarly, a Penn State personal statement that falls short of the recommended length might not effectively demonstrate a thorough understanding of the university’s offerings or a compelling reason for wanting to attend. Consequently, skillful management of length is paramount for conveying a complete and persuasive message.
In summary, length constraints form a critical component in the crafting of both the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement. By understanding and adhering to these limitations, applicants demonstrate respect for the admissions process, enhance the clarity and concision of their writing, and ultimately increase the likelihood of a favorable evaluation. The challenge lies in optimizing content selection and stylistic choices to effectively address the prompt within the prescribed boundaries. Careful attention to these details contributes significantly to the overall persuasiveness and professionalism of the application.
5. University focus
University focus represents a fundamental differentiating factor between the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement. The Common Application essay, designed for submission to multiple institutions, intentionally avoids a specific institutional emphasis. Its purpose is to showcase an applicant’s character, skills, and experiences independently of any particular university’s environment. Conversely, the Penn State personal statement requires a direct and demonstrable focus on Penn State University. The essay should articulate a clear understanding of the university’s academic programs, research opportunities, campus culture, and values, directly linking the applicant’s aspirations to these specific aspects of Penn State.
The causal relationship between university focus and the efficacy of the Penn State personal statement is profound. Essays lacking a discernible connection to Penn State often convey a lack of genuine interest or insufficient preparation. For example, a narrative describing a passion for engineering without referencing Penn State’s renowned engineering program or specific faculty expertise diminishes the essay’s persuasive impact. Conversely, an essay detailing how the applicant’s interest in sustainable agriculture aligns with Penn State’s research initiatives in that area demonstrates a clear understanding of the university’s priorities and a compelling reason for seeking admission. This targeted approach transforms the essay from a generic self-assessment into a strategic argument for the applicant’s suitability for Penn State.
In summary, the degree of university focus critically distinguishes the Penn State personal statement from the Common Application essay. Success hinges on a deliberate and informed alignment of the applicant’s skills, experiences, and aspirations with the unique characteristics of Penn State University. The challenge lies in articulating this connection persuasively, demonstrating both a comprehensive understanding of Penn State’s offerings and a clear rationale for seeking admission to the institution. By prioritizing university focus, applicants significantly strengthen the persuasive impact of their application and signal their genuine commitment to becoming a contributing member of the Penn State community.
6. Topic flexibility
Topic flexibility represents a critical distinction between the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement. The degree of latitude in topic selection significantly influences the applicant’s strategic approach to crafting a compelling narrative.
-
Common Application’s Broad Scope
The Common Application essay offers considerable topic flexibility. Applicants can choose from a set of prompts designed to elicit reflections on personal growth, significant experiences, or deeply held beliefs. This allows for a wide range of narratives, from overcoming adversity to exploring a passion or talent. The key is to showcase personal qualities and writing ability, rather than addressing a specific institutional need or program. For example, an applicant might discuss a transformative travel experience or a personal challenge overcome, without necessarily connecting it to any specific academic pursuit. The implication is that the essay should demonstrate broader personal attributes rather than specific institutional fit.
-
Penn State’s Targeted Focus
The Penn State personal statement, conversely, often constrains topic flexibility. Prompts typically center on the applicant’s reasons for choosing Penn State, their intended major, or their potential contributions to the university community. This necessitates a targeted approach, where the topic must directly align with Penn State’s academic offerings, research opportunities, or campus culture. An applicant discussing their interest in environmental science, for example, should ideally link it to specific research labs or faculty within Penn State’s environmental science program. This targeted focus restricts the range of acceptable topics but allows for a more persuasive demonstration of interest and preparedness for the university’s specific environment.
-
Strategic Topic Selection
Strategic topic selection becomes paramount given these differing levels of flexibility. For the Common Application essay, applicants should choose a topic that best showcases their personality, writing skills, and personal growth, irrespective of institutional considerations. For the Penn State personal statement, applicants must carefully select a topic that allows them to articulate a clear understanding of Penn State’s offerings and a compelling rationale for seeking admission. A misaligned topic can undermine the entire application, regardless of the quality of writing. Therefore, understanding the limitations and opportunities presented by each essay’s topic flexibility is essential for maximizing application impact.
-
Impact on Narrative Development
Topic flexibility influences the narrative development of each essay. The Common Application essay allows for a more expansive and exploratory narrative, where the applicant can delve into personal reflections and broader themes. The Penn State personal statement requires a more focused and analytical narrative, where the applicant must present a clear argument for their suitability for the university. This difference in narrative development underscores the importance of tailoring the essay’s structure, tone, and content to meet the specific expectations of each application component. Failing to adapt the narrative appropriately can result in an essay that is either too generic for Penn State’s evaluation or too narrowly focused for the Common Application’s broader audience.
In conclusion, the degree of topic flexibility significantly shapes the strategic approach to both the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement. The Common Application’s broad scope encourages a wider range of narratives focused on personal qualities, while the Penn State essay necessitates a targeted focus on the university’s specific attributes. Recognizing and adapting to these differing levels of flexibility is crucial for crafting compelling essays that effectively showcase the applicant’s potential and enhance their chances of admission.
7. Strategic alignment
Strategic alignment is a critical consideration when approaching both the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement. It refers to the degree to which the content, tone, and overall message of an essay resonate with the specific goals and expectations associated with each application component. Effective strategic alignment maximizes the persuasive power of the essays and strengthens the overall application package.
-
Institutional Mission Alignment
The Penn State personal statement necessitates a clear alignment with the university’s mission and values. The essay should subtly demonstrate an understanding of Penn State’s commitment to research, teaching, and service, and highlight how the applicant’s goals and experiences resonate with these priorities. Examples include referencing specific research initiatives, highlighting engagement in community service projects, or articulating an appreciation for Penn State’s academic environment. The Common Application essay, while not directly tied to any single institution, can indirectly demonstrate alignment by showcasing qualities valued across a broad range of universities, such as intellectual curiosity, leadership potential, or commitment to ethical conduct.
-
Personal Brand Alignment
Both essays should strategically align with the applicant’s overall “personal brand,” or the image they wish to project to admissions committees. This involves identifying key attributes and experiences that differentiate the applicant and crafting narratives that consistently reinforce these strengths. For the Common Application essay, this might involve selecting a topic that showcases a unique talent or perspective. For the Penn State personal statement, it involves highlighting experiences that demonstrate preparedness for the university’s academic environment and potential contributions to its community. The goal is to present a cohesive and compelling picture of the applicant as a whole.
-
Prompt-Specific Goal Alignment
Each essay must strategically align with the specific goals of the prompt it addresses. The Common Application essay requires applicants to reflect on a significant experience or personal quality, demonstrating self-awareness and analytical skills. The Penn State personal statement requires applicants to articulate a clear rationale for choosing Penn State and to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the university’s offerings. Failure to align the essay with the prompt’s intended purpose diminishes its effectiveness and signals a lack of attention to detail.
-
Narrative Coherence Alignment
Strategic alignment also involves ensuring narrative coherence within each essay. This means that the various components of the essay the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion should work together to create a unified and persuasive message. For the Common Application essay, this might involve establishing a clear theme and developing it consistently throughout the narrative. For the Penn State personal statement, it involves presenting a logical argument for the applicant’s suitability for the university, supported by concrete examples and evidence. In both cases, coherence enhances the essay’s clarity and strengthens its overall impact.
The successful navigation of both the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement relies heavily on the principle of strategic alignment. By ensuring that each essay’s content, tone, and message resonate with the specific goals, expectations, and values associated with each application component, applicants can significantly enhance their chances of admission. Effective strategic alignment transforms the essays from mere writing samples into powerful tools for self-expression and persuasive communication, demonstrating the applicant’s potential to thrive in a university environment.
8. Narrative Scope
Narrative scope, the breadth and depth of the story told within an essay, profoundly differentiates the Common Application essay from the Penn State personal statement. The Common Application essay often accommodates a broader narrative scope, inviting applicants to explore diverse aspects of their identities, experiences, or perspectives. Conversely, the Penn State personal statement typically requires a more focused narrative scope, emphasizing specific reasons for the applicant’s interest in the university and aligning their qualifications with its unique offerings.
-
Common Application: Wide-Angle Lens
The Common Application essay operates like a wide-angle lens, capturing a significant portion of the applicant’s background or personality. This allows for narratives spanning multiple experiences or focusing on a single transformative event with broad implications. For instance, an applicant might discuss a series of volunteer activities, a long-standing passion for music, or a challenging family situation. The key is to reveal character traits, values, and personal growth, rather than focusing on direct relevance to any specific institution. The narrative may touch upon academic interests, but it is not constrained by them.
-
Penn State: Telephoto Lens
The Penn State personal statement functions more like a telephoto lens, zooming in on specific aspects of the applicant’s profile that align with the university’s programs, research opportunities, or campus culture. The narrative scope is intentionally narrower, focusing on demonstrable connections between the applicant’s aspirations and Penn State’s offerings. For example, an applicant might detail their interest in a specific research lab, highlight their participation in relevant extracurricular activities, or articulate their understanding of Penn State’s academic environment. The narrative must directly address the prompt’s requirements and demonstrate a clear understanding of the university’s values and priorities.
-
Impact on Content Selection
Narrative scope significantly impacts content selection for each essay. The Common Application essay allows for a more diverse range of topics, focusing on personal narratives that reveal character and potential. The Penn State personal statement demands a more selective approach, prioritizing experiences and achievements that directly relate to the applicant’s academic interests and their potential contribution to the Penn State community. This necessitates thorough research into Penn State’s offerings and a thoughtful reflection on how the applicant’s skills and interests align with those offerings.
-
Strategic Implications for Applicants
Applicants must carefully consider narrative scope when crafting their essays. Choosing a topic with an appropriate narrative scope enhances the essay’s effectiveness. A narrative too broad for the Penn State personal statement may lack the necessary focus and fail to demonstrate a genuine interest in the university. Conversely, a narrative too narrowly focused for the Common Application essay may fail to showcase the applicant’s personality and potential. Therefore, understanding the distinct expectations for narrative scope is essential for maximizing application impact.
By strategically adapting the narrative scope to the specific requirements of each application component, applicants can craft compelling essays that effectively showcase their potential and enhance their chances of admission. The challenge lies in effectively adapting and tailoring narratives to meet the nuanced expectations of each application component, a skill critical to college admission success. Effective management of narrative scope ensures the applicant presents a compelling and persuasive case for admission, tailored to the specific audience and objectives of each essay.
9. Evaluative criteria
The application essays, including the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement, are assessed against a distinct set of evaluative criteria, influencing admission decisions. These criteria, though overlapping, prioritize different aspects of the applicant’s profile depending on the essay’s purpose. A primary distinction lies in the relative weight assigned to institutional fit versus general qualities. The Common Application essay evaluation emphasizes writing proficiency, critical thinking, and the applicant’s capacity for self-reflection, irrespective of a specific institution. Conversely, the Penn State personal statement evaluation places significant weight on the applicant’s understanding of, and demonstrated interest in, Penn State’s specific programs, research opportunities, and community values. This necessitates a tailored approach to content and presentation.
For example, a Common Application essay might explore a student’s passion for environmental activism, showcasing their leadership skills and commitment to social change. The evaluative criteria would focus on the clarity of expression, the depth of reflection, and the persuasiveness of the narrative. A Penn State personal statement, however, addressing a similar interest in environmental science, would be assessed based on the applicant’s knowledge of Penn State’s environmental science program, their understanding of relevant research initiatives at the university, and their articulation of how their skills and experiences align with Penn State’s academic environment. Failure to demonstrate this institutional knowledge weakens the application, regardless of the quality of writing. Practical application involves thorough research of Penn State’s offerings and a targeted alignment of the essay content with the university’s priorities.
In summary, evaluative criteria play a crucial role in distinguishing the Penn State personal statement from the Common Application essay. While both essays are assessed for writing quality and critical thinking, the Penn State essay evaluation prioritizes institutional fit and a demonstrated understanding of the university’s specific characteristics. The challenge lies in understanding and adhering to these distinct evaluative frameworks to maximize the persuasive impact of each essay. By strategically tailoring content and presentation to align with the specific criteria used by admissions committees, applicants significantly enhance their chances of admission. Effective navigation of these differing expectations is critical for a successful application.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following questions address common concerns regarding the distinctions between the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement. These clarifications aim to provide prospective students with a clearer understanding of application requirements.
Question 1: Is the Common Application essay submitted to Penn State sufficient, or is a separate personal statement required?
Penn State often requires a supplemental essay in addition to the Common Application essay. The Common Application essay serves as a general introduction, while the Penn State personal statement allows for a more specific demonstration of interest and qualifications relevant to the university’s programs and values.
Question 2: What is the ideal length for the Penn State personal statement?
The ideal length for the Penn State personal statement is dictated by the specific instructions provided on the application portal. Adherence to the stated word count or page limit is crucial. Exceeding or significantly falling short of the specified length may negatively impact the evaluation.
Question 3: Can the same essay be used for both the Common Application and the Penn State personal statement?
While some content from the Common Application essay may be relevant, a direct copy-and-paste approach is ill-advised. The Penn State personal statement demands a tailored response that directly addresses the university’s specific prompts and demonstrates a clear understanding of its offerings.
Question 4: What topics are most appropriate for the Penn State personal statement?
Appropriate topics for the Penn State personal statement directly align with the university’s academic programs, research opportunities, or campus culture. Examples include articulating a passion for a specific field of study, highlighting relevant research experience, or demonstrating an understanding of Penn State’s values.
Question 5: How important is demonstrating knowledge of Penn State in the personal statement?
Demonstrating knowledge of Penn State is of paramount importance in the personal statement. The essay should showcase a clear understanding of the university’s unique offerings and a compelling rationale for seeking admission to that specific institution.
Question 6: What are the key differences in evaluative criteria between the two essays?
The Common Application essay evaluation focuses primarily on writing proficiency, critical thinking, and personal qualities. The Penn State personal statement evaluation places significant weight on institutional fit, demonstrated interest, and a clear understanding of the university’s programs and values.
Understanding these distinctions is crucial for crafting effective application essays that showcase a candidate’s potential for success.
The following section provides resources for further research and guidance.
Tips
The following tips are designed to help applicants effectively differentiate between the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement, maximizing the impact of each.
Tip 1: Understand the Prompt
Carefully analyze the prompt for each essay. The Common Application offers broad, reflective prompts, while the Penn State prompts typically focus on institutional fit and specific academic interests. A thorough understanding of the prompt’s intent guides content selection and narrative development.
Tip 2: Tailor Content Strategically
The content presented in each essay should be tailored to the specific audience and purpose. The Common Application essay allows for a broader range of personal narratives, while the Penn State personal statement should highlight experiences and achievements directly relevant to the university’s programs and values.
Tip 3: Demonstrate Institutional Knowledge
In the Penn State personal statement, demonstrate specific knowledge of the university’s academic offerings, research opportunities, and campus culture. Referencing specific faculty, programs, or initiatives strengthens the connection between the applicant and the institution.
Tip 4: Maintain Strategic Alignment
Ensure that the overall message of each essay aligns with the applicant’s personal brand and the stated goals of the application. The Common Application essay should showcase broader qualities valued by universities, while the Penn State personal statement should emphasize suitability for that specific institution.
Tip 5: Adhere to Length Constraints
Pay close attention to the stated word count or page limit for each essay. Exceeding or significantly falling short of these limitations can negatively impact the evaluation. Concise expression and strategic storytelling are essential.
Tip 6: Revise and Seek Feedback
Carefully revise each essay, paying attention to grammar, clarity, and overall impact. Seek feedback from trusted teachers, counselors, or mentors to identify areas for improvement and ensure the essay effectively conveys the intended message.
Implementing these tips will ensure that applicants differentiate between the Common Application essay and the Penn State personal statement effectively. By strategically tailoring content, demonstrating institutional knowledge, and maintaining alignment with specific goals, applicants can significantly enhance their chances of admission.
Subsequent resources and further exploration of these concepts can enhance understanding and inform preparation for both application components.
penn state personal statement vs common app essay
This exploration has underscored the fundamental distinctions between the Penn State personal statement and the Common Application essay. Prompt specificity, audience consideration, content tailoring, length constraints, university focus, topic flexibility, strategic alignment, narrative scope, and evaluative criteria all contribute to a differentiated approach. Acknowledging these nuances is paramount for applicants seeking to maximize their chances of admission.
The application process demands careful consideration and strategic execution. Future applicants should approach each essay as a unique opportunity to present their qualifications, ensuring a clear understanding of institutional priorities and a compelling articulation of personal aspirations. Diligence in preparation and thoughtful execution are the keys to a successful application.
