Within the Common Application, “rank weighting” refers to the practice of some high schools assigning more weight to certain courses, often honors or advanced placement (AP) courses, when calculating a student’s Grade Point Average (GPA). This weighting system aims to reflect the increased rigor and academic challenge presented by these courses compared to standard-level classes. For example, an ‘A’ in an AP course might be worth 5.0 points, while an ‘A’ in a standard course is worth 4.0 points, thus potentially elevating a student’s overall GPA above the standard 4.0 scale.
The implementation of weighted GPA scales serves to acknowledge and reward students who undertake more demanding coursework. It provides a more nuanced representation of a student’s academic performance than an unweighted GPA, which treats all courses equally regardless of difficulty. Historically, weighted GPAs emerged as a way for high schools to differentiate between students with similar grades but varying course selections, particularly in competitive college admissions environments. It helps colleges assess a students academic preparedness, and demonstrates the students willingness to embrace academic challenge.
Understanding how a high school weights its GPA is essential when completing the academic section of the Common Application. It allows students to accurately represent their academic achievement. The Common Application typically requests both weighted and unweighted GPA information, enabling colleges to evaluate applicants within the context of their high school’s grading system.
1. Advanced Course Recognition
Advanced course recognition is intrinsically linked to the meaning of rank weighting on the Common Application. Rank weighting, at its core, is a mechanism designed to acknowledge and reward the academic rigor of advanced coursework. The act of weighting assigns a greater value to grades earned in challenging courses, such as Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), or honors classes, compared to standard-level courses. This differentiation serves to highlight a student’s willingness to undertake more demanding academic work. For example, a student who consistently earns ‘A’s in AP courses will see their weighted GPA reflect the difficulty of their curriculum more accurately than an unweighted GPA, thus signaling to colleges their preparedness for higher-level studies. Without advanced course recognition, rank weighting would be rendered meaningless; it is the foundation upon which the entire system of weighted GPA calculations is built.
The practical application of advanced course recognition through rank weighting extends beyond a simple numerical adjustment. It informs the college admissions process by providing a more comprehensive evaluation of a student’s academic profile. Colleges can use the weighted GPA to assess a student’s performance within the context of the specific opportunities and challenges presented by their high school’s curriculum. For instance, two students with identical unweighted GPAs might present drastically different weighted GPAs, revealing that one student consistently pursued more rigorous coursework. This information allows admissions officers to make more informed decisions, recognizing and rewarding students who have demonstrated a commitment to academic excellence by selecting challenging courses.
In summary, advanced course recognition is not merely a feature of rank weighting but rather its fundamental purpose. It enables a more nuanced and equitable evaluation of students by acknowledging the varying levels of difficulty inherent in different courses. While challenges exist in standardizing weighting systems across different high schools, the underlying principle of recognizing and rewarding academic rigor remains a cornerstone of the Common Application’s academic assessment process.
2. GPA Scale Adjustment
GPA scale adjustment is a direct consequence and implementation detail of rank weighting as applied on the Common Application. It represents the tangible method through which the relative value of different courses is reflected in a student’s academic record.
-
Numerical Modification
GPA scale adjustment typically involves altering the standard 4.0 GPA scale to accommodate the increased weight given to honors, AP, or IB courses. For instance, an ‘A’ in a standard course might be assigned a value of 4.0, while an ‘A’ in an AP course could be valued at 5.0. This numerical modification directly affects a student’s overall GPA, potentially raising it above the traditional 4.0 maximum. This adjustment acknowledges the greater effort and challenge associated with the more rigorous curriculum.
-
Differential Weighting Systems
High schools employ various differential weighting systems to adjust GPA scales. Some schools may use a simple binary system, assigning a fixed additional point to advanced courses. Others might implement a more complex system that considers the specific type of advanced course and the grade earned. The chosen system impacts the magnitude of GPA adjustment and influences the relative standing of students within their graduating class. For example, a student consistently taking the most challenging courses would experience a more substantial GPA increase compared to a student who takes only a few advanced courses.
-
Contextual Interpretation
GPA scale adjustment necessitates contextual interpretation by college admissions officers. A weighted GPA of 4.5, for example, carries different meaning depending on the specific weighting system employed by the applicant’s high school. Colleges must understand the weighting scheme to accurately assess the applicant’s academic performance relative to other applicants. The Common Application provides a space for high schools to detail their GPA weighting policies, which aids colleges in this interpretive process. This detailed understanding of the contextual differences between different schools is the only way to properly interpret a student’s application.
-
Potential for Inflation
GPA scale adjustment can potentially lead to grade inflation, where a significant portion of the student body presents with GPAs exceeding the standard 4.0 benchmark. This inflation can make it more difficult for colleges to differentiate between high-achieving students and may necessitate a greater reliance on other factors, such as standardized test scores, essays, and extracurricular activities, in the admissions process. This requires a deeper look beyond simply a number to properly assess an application.
GPA scale adjustment is an integral part of the rank weighting process on the Common Application. Its implementation directly affects a student’s GPA and influences how colleges interpret their academic performance. By understanding the various facets of GPA scale adjustment, students and admissions officers can more accurately assess and evaluate academic achievement within the context of a given high school’s curriculum and grading policies.
3. College Application Context
The relevance of weighting a student’s class rank in the Common Application stems directly from the college application context. Colleges utilize this data point to understand a student’s academic performance relative to their peers within the same high school. This contextualization is essential because grading standards and curriculum rigor vary significantly between institutions. A student ranked in the top 10% at one high school may possess different academic qualifications compared to a student ranked in the top 10% at another, more competitive school. Therefore, weighting a student’s class rank serves as a tool to normalize these discrepancies, providing admissions officers with a more equitable basis for comparison.
Consider two hypothetical applicants. Applicant A attends a highly selective private school with a rigorous curriculum and a large number of students applying to top-tier universities. Applicant B attends a public school with fewer resources and a less competitive academic environment. If both students report being in the top 20% of their graduating class, colleges must interpret this information within the context of each student’s school profile. A weighted class rank, if available, offers additional insight. If Applicant A’s school weights its rank based on course difficulty, it might more accurately reflect Applicant A’s relative academic achievement compared to Applicant B, whose school might not use any weighting system. Colleges can then use other elements to compare, such as class rigor and extracurriculars.
In conclusion, the college application context is intrinsically linked to the rationale for rank weighting. It enables colleges to go beyond simple GPAs and standardized test scores, providing a deeper understanding of a student’s academic achievements within the context of their specific educational environment. While rank weighting is not universally implemented, its potential to provide valuable contextual information makes it a significant factor in the holistic review process employed by many colleges and universities. The challenge lies in ensuring transparency and consistency in weighting methodologies across different high schools to maximize the fairness and accuracy of the college admissions process.
4. Weighted vs. Unweighted
The distinction between weighted and unweighted Grade Point Averages (GPAs) is central to understanding rank weighting within the Common Application. The presence or absence of weighting directly affects how a student’s academic achievement is perceived by colleges. A weighted GPA considers the difficulty of courses taken, assigning a higher point value to honors, Advanced Placement (AP), or International Baccalaureate (IB) courses, whereas an unweighted GPA treats all courses equally, regardless of their rigor. Therefore, the use of a weighted GPA represents an attempt to provide a more nuanced and comprehensive picture of a student’s academic performance by acknowledging their willingness to tackle challenging coursework. The choice between these two metrics can significantly impact a student’s class rank and, consequently, their standing in the college admissions process.
Consider two students attending the same high school. Both students have a 3.7 GPA on an unweighted scale. However, Student A primarily took standard-level courses, while Student B enrolled in several AP and IB classes. If the high school uses a weighted GPA scale, Student B’s GPA would likely be higher than Student A’s, reflecting the increased difficulty of their curriculum. When these students apply to colleges via the Common Application, the weighted GPA, if provided, signals to admissions officers that Student B has demonstrated a greater willingness to challenge themselves academically. The unweighted GPA, while still important, provides a different perspective, highlighting the students’ overall consistency in achieving high grades across all courses. The Common Application typically requests both weighted and unweighted GPAs to provide colleges with a comprehensive view of the applicant’s academic profile.
In summary, the interplay between weighted and unweighted GPAs is crucial for understanding what rank weighting means within the Common Application. Weighted GPAs acknowledge academic rigor, while unweighted GPAs reflect overall grade consistency. Colleges utilize both metrics, considering them within the context of the applicant’s high school’s curriculum and grading policies. Challenges arise from the lack of standardization in weighting methodologies across different schools. As such, it is important for students to understand their high school’s policies regarding GPA calculation and to accurately represent their academic achievements on the Common Application, ensuring colleges have a complete and accurate picture of their qualifications.
5. Honors Class Enhancement
Honors Class Enhancement represents a direct beneficiary of rank weighting within the Common Application. It describes the elevation of honors courses in the academic hierarchy, achieved through the application of weighting formulas. This enhancement acknowledges the more challenging curriculum and increased expectations associated with honors-level studies, and it is reflected in a student’s Grade Point Average (GPA).
-
GPA Amplification
GPA Amplification is a primary outcome of rank weighting as it applies to honors classes. By assigning a higher point value to grades earned in these courses, the overall GPA of a student enrolled in honors classes will be demonstrably higher than if an unweighted system were used. For instance, an “A” in an honors course might be worth 4.5 or 5.0 points on a weighted scale, compared to the standard 4.0. This directly enhances the GPA, potentially improving the student’s class rank and college admission prospects. The student’s efforts in a more demanding academic setting are thus acknowledged and rewarded quantitatively.
-
Competitive Advantage
The enhancement of honors classes through rank weighting grants students a competitive advantage in the college application process. Colleges often consider the rigor of a student’s coursework when making admission decisions. A weighted GPA, prominently displaying the impact of honors classes, signals to admissions officers that the student has pursued a more challenging academic path. This differentiation can be particularly crucial in competitive admission scenarios, where a slight GPA advantage can significantly impact the outcome. Demonstrating the willingness and ability to succeed in honors-level work showcases academic potential beyond standard course performance.
-
Motivation and Recognition
Rank weighting serves as a motivator for students to enroll in honors classes. Knowing that their efforts in these more demanding courses will be recognized through a higher GPA, students are incentivized to challenge themselves academically. Furthermore, it provides recognition for those students who already excel in honors classes, validating their hard work and commitment. This acknowledgement can foster a positive feedback loop, encouraging students to continue pursuing academic excellence throughout their high school careers, knowing their dedication is noted.
-
Accurate Academic Representation
Honors Class Enhancement through rank weighting contributes to a more accurate representation of a student’s academic profile within the Common Application. Unweighted GPAs can obscure the differences in course difficulty, potentially disadvantaging students who have consistently taken more challenging classes. By incorporating the weighting system, colleges gain a clearer understanding of a student’s academic capabilities and their willingness to push themselves beyond the standard curriculum. This more nuanced evaluation allows for a fairer assessment of a student’s potential for success at the college level. Without this enhancement, academic rigor would be masked, impacting proper assessment.
In conclusion, Honors Class Enhancement is a direct consequence of rank weighting within the Common Application, providing tangible benefits to students who engage in rigorous academic pursuits. It not only amplifies GPA scores but also offers a competitive advantage and a sense of recognition, thus fostering a more accurate representation of academic achievement in the college admissions process. Understanding this connection allows students to strategically navigate their course selections and present their academic credentials in the most favorable light.
6. Rigor and Academic Challenge
Rigor and academic challenge are central concepts intertwined with the practice of rank weighting on the Common Application. Rank weighting seeks to quantify and acknowledge the increased demands of more difficult coursework, thereby providing a mechanism to differentiate students who undertake such challenges from those who do not. The following facets illustrate the relationship between rigor, academic challenge, and its reflection within the Common Application through weighted GPAs.
-
Differentiated Course Value
The core function of rank weighting is to assign a greater value to grades earned in courses deemed more rigorous. Advanced Placement (AP), International Baccalaureate (IB), and honors classes often receive this preferential treatment. For instance, an ‘A’ in an AP course may contribute more points towards a student’s GPA than an ‘A’ in a standard course. This differentiation acknowledges the increased workload, complex subject matter, and higher expectations associated with these courses. Without this differentiation, the increased demands would not be adequately reflected in a student’s academic record, potentially disadvantaging those who pursue more challenging curricula. Understanding this value is key for using weighting properly.
-
Motivation for Academic Pursuit
Rank weighting serves as an incentive for students to embrace academic challenges. Knowing that their efforts in more rigorous courses will be acknowledged through a higher GPA, students may be more inclined to enroll in AP, IB, or honors classes. This incentivization can lead to a more academically enriched high school experience, fostering a culture of intellectual curiosity and a willingness to push oneself beyond one’s comfort zone. This is a key benefit of rank weighting, if implemented properly and in the appropriate setting. Students will be more likely to take on the burden of difficult courses.
-
College Admissions Signal
A weighted GPA, accurately reflecting the rigor of a student’s coursework, serves as a signal to college admissions officers. It demonstrates a student’s willingness to challenge themselves academically and their capacity to succeed in demanding environments. Colleges often view this as a positive attribute, suggesting that the student is well-prepared for the academic rigor of higher education. Therefore, a weighted GPA serves as a valuable component of the overall college application, conveying information beyond simple grades. Furthermore, the lack of difficulty would indicate a student may not be ready for a demanding college environment.
-
Contextual Academic Assessment
Rank weighting provides context to a student’s GPA, allowing college admissions officers to assess academic performance within the framework of a specific high school’s curriculum. It acknowledges that a 4.0 GPA at one high school may represent a different level of academic achievement than a 4.0 GPA at another. By considering both weighted and unweighted GPAs, colleges can gain a more nuanced understanding of a student’s academic journey, taking into account the challenges they faced and the opportunities they pursued. This allows for a more thorough view than the common GPA metric, giving colleges the data to pick the correct candidate.
In conclusion, the concept of rigor and academic challenge is inextricably linked to the meaning and purpose of rank weighting on the Common Application. Rank weighting is designed to acknowledge, reward, and communicate a student’s engagement with challenging coursework, thereby providing a more comprehensive and informative picture of their academic capabilities to college admissions officers. While debates continue regarding the fairness and consistency of weighting methodologies, the underlying principle of recognizing academic rigor remains a central aspect of the college application process.
7. Performance Differentiation
Performance differentiation is a primary objective and outcome directly enabled by rank weighting as implemented through the Common Application. Rank weighting provides a mechanism to distinguish student academic performance based on the rigor of their coursework. Without rank weighting, all courses are treated equally, potentially obscuring meaningful differences in academic achievement. By assigning increased weight to advanced courses, students who excel in challenging environments are recognized, thereby differentiating them from peers who pursue a standard curriculum. For example, two students with identical unweighted GPAs may have significantly different weighted GPAs, revealing that one consistently opted for AP or IB courses. This distinction assists college admissions committees in identifying candidates who demonstrate a propensity for academic challenge. Proper performance differentiation is an important aspect of the role of class weight.
The importance of performance differentiation becomes particularly evident in highly competitive college admissions scenarios. In such contexts, even minor differences in GPA or class rank can significantly impact a student’s chances of acceptance. Rank weighting amplifies the impact of high performance in advanced courses, effectively rewarding students who have demonstrated the aptitude and motivation to succeed in demanding academic settings. This differentiation is not merely numerical; it provides colleges with a richer understanding of an applicant’s academic trajectory and their ability to thrive in a rigorous collegiate environment. It helps the college see how prepared a potential candidate is for higher learning in a complex educational system.
In conclusion, performance differentiation is an essential component of rank weighting within the Common Application. It allows colleges to more accurately assess student academic performance, rewarding those who embrace challenging coursework and distinguishing them from peers with similar unweighted GPAs. Although challenges exist in standardizing weighting systems across various high schools, the fundamental goal of differentiating academic performance remains a critical objective in the college admissions process, and performance differentiation helps resolve this.
8. Competitive Admissions Factor
Within the highly selective college admissions landscape, rank weighting on the Common Application assumes heightened significance. It functions as one of many data points colleges consider when evaluating candidates vying for limited spaces. The inherent competitiveness of this process elevates the importance of accurately representing academic achievement, making rank weighting a relevant, if not universally applied, factor.
-
GPA Enhancement for Rigorous Coursework
Rank weighting allows students who have pursued challenging curricula, such as Advanced Placement (AP) or International Baccalaureate (IB) courses, to showcase the impact of this rigor on their academic record. In a competitive applicant pool where numerous students possess high GPAs, a weighted GPA may differentiate a candidate who has consistently exceeded the demands of standard coursework. This is beneficial to the candidate, helping elevate them above other applicants.
-
Contextualization of Academic Performance
Colleges recognize that high schools vary significantly in grading standards and curriculum difficulty. Rank weighting, where available, provides context for a student’s GPA within their specific high school environment. This contextualization becomes crucial in competitive admissions scenarios, where colleges seek to understand a student’s academic achievements relative to their peers and the opportunities available to them. Without weighting, it can be difficult to tell how a student performs compared to their peers.
-
Differentiation Among High-Achievers
Competitive admissions often involve distinguishing between a large pool of exceptionally qualified applicants. Rank weighting serves as a tool for further differentiation, enabling colleges to identify students who have not only excelled but also actively sought out and thrived in the most challenging academic settings. These are key qualities colleges are looking for, in order to have the best, brightest, and most challenged students.
-
Holistic Review Considerations
While rank weighting can be a factor in competitive admissions, it is important to recognize that colleges typically employ a holistic review process. This means that admissions decisions are based on a comprehensive evaluation of a student’s academic record, extracurricular activities, essays, letters of recommendation, and other factors. Rank weighting is therefore considered in conjunction with other aspects of the application, rather than being the sole determinant of admission. This is critical to note, as there are a variety of factors that determine a college applicant’s acceptance.
While not all high schools employ rank weighting, and its methodologies can vary significantly, its potential impact on competitive college admissions warrants careful consideration. Students should understand their high school’s policies regarding GPA calculation and rank weighting to accurately represent their academic achievements on the Common Application. Regardless of the presence or absence of rank weighting, a commitment to academic rigor and a well-rounded application remain essential for navigating the competitive college admissions landscape.
9. High School Grading System
The high school grading system forms the foundational context within which rank weighting operates on the Common Application. Rank weighting is, at its core, a modification applied to a student’s Grade Point Average (GPA), a metric derived directly from the grading system employed by their high school. The grading system dictates how individual course grades are converted into a numerical value, typically on a 4.0 scale, and this value then serves as the basis for GPA calculation. Therefore, any attempt to understand rank weighting necessitates a thorough understanding of the specific high school grading system in question. For example, a high school that uses a percentage-based grading system (e.g., 90-100%=A) will produce different GPA values than a school using a letter grade system without pluses or minuses (e.g., A=4.0, B=3.0). These differences directly influence how rank weighting is applied and ultimately how it is interpreted by college admissions officers.
The impact of the high school grading system on rank weighting extends beyond the basic GPA calculation. Some grading systems include provisions for grade inflation or deflation, which can significantly distort the meaning of a student’s GPA. For example, a high school with a policy of awarding exceptionally high grades across all courses might artificially inflate student GPAs, making it difficult to differentiate between high-achieving students. In such cases, rank weighting, particularly if it assigns greater weight to advanced courses, can help to mitigate the effects of grade inflation by providing a more nuanced assessment of academic performance. Conversely, a grading system that is particularly rigorous and grade-deflating might disadvantage students, and rank weighting could help balance this. However, the effectiveness of rank weighting in either scenario depends on the specific weighting methodology employed and the extent to which it accurately reflects the relative difficulty of different courses.
In conclusion, the high school grading system is an inseparable component of rank weighting as it pertains to the Common Application. Understanding the intricacies of a given high school’s grading system is crucial for accurately interpreting GPA values and assessing the impact of rank weighting. Colleges utilize both weighted and unweighted GPAs, understanding that each school has a unique grading context, to contextualize a student’s academic record and make informed admission decisions. Challenges remain in standardizing weighting methodologies across different schools, but the fundamental connection between the grading system and rank weighting underscores the need for transparency and clarity in reporting academic information on the Common Application. Thus the grading system is intrinsically linked to weight class ranking, and can never be ignored.
Frequently Asked Questions
The following addresses common inquiries regarding rank weighting, its relevance, and its implications for college applications submitted via the Common Application.
Question 1: What, precisely, constitutes rank weighting within the context of the Common Application?
Rank weighting signifies the practice wherein a high school assigns differing levels of importance to various courses when calculating a student’s Grade Point Average (GPA). Honors, Advanced Placement (AP), and International Baccalaureate (IB) courses often receive a higher weight than standard-level courses, acknowledging their increased academic rigor.
Question 2: Why do some high schools utilize rank weighting systems?
Rank weighting systems aim to provide a more nuanced representation of a student’s academic performance. By accounting for the difficulty of coursework, they offer a more comprehensive assessment than unweighted GPAs, potentially incentivizing students to pursue challenging courses.
Question 3: How does rank weighting affect a student’s GPA?
Rank weighting typically results in a higher GPA compared to an unweighted calculation, provided the student has successfully completed weighted courses. The specific impact varies depending on the weighting system implemented by the high school.
Question 4: Does every high school employ rank weighting?
No, rank weighting is not universally implemented. Many high schools utilize unweighted GPA scales, treating all courses equally regardless of difficulty. The prevalence of rank weighting varies regionally and by school type.
Question 5: How do colleges interpret weighted GPAs on the Common Application?
Colleges consider weighted GPAs within the context of the applicant’s high school’s profile and grading policies. The Common Application typically requests both weighted and unweighted GPAs, allowing admissions officers to evaluate academic performance using multiple metrics. Colleges will review this information alongside other factors, such as the student’s class rank.
Question 6: Is rank weighting the most important factor in college admissions?
No, rank weighting represents only one factor among many in the holistic college admissions process. Colleges also consider standardized test scores (if submitted), essays, extracurricular activities, letters of recommendation, and demonstrated leadership qualities. Academic rigor is a key element in the application process, and rank weighting can reflect how challenging the student’s academic work load was.
In summary, rank weighting serves as a mechanism to acknowledge academic rigor, though its significance is best understood within the broader context of an applicant’s overall profile. Students and parents should seek clarification from their high school regarding its GPA calculation and weighting policies.
The following section will discuss additional strategies for strengthening a Common Application.
Tips for Common Application Success
The following provides guidance on effectively presenting academic achievements on the Common Application, particularly concerning rank weighting. A clear and accurate representation of academic standing enhances a student’s profile.
Tip 1: Understand the High School’s Policy: Students must thoroughly understand their high school’s policy on rank weighting. This includes knowing which courses are weighted, the weighting scale employed, and whether class rank is based on weighted or unweighted GPA. This foundational knowledge enables accurate reporting on the Common Application.
Tip 2: Accurately Report Both Weighted and Unweighted GPAs: The Common Application typically requests both weighted and unweighted GPAs. Ensure both values are accurately reported according to the high school’s official transcript. Discrepancies can raise questions regarding the applicant’s integrity.
Tip 3: Provide Context in the Additional Information Section: If the high school’s rank weighting policy is unusual or complex, use the “Additional Information” section to provide a brief explanation. Clarity assists admissions officers in understanding the student’s academic context.
Tip 4: Highlight Rigorous Course Selection: Regardless of rank weighting, emphasize the pursuit of challenging coursework, such as AP or IB classes. The Common Application provides space to list all courses taken. A transcript demonstrates to admissions that the student will take on a challenge.
Tip 5: Showcase Academic Achievements Beyond GPA: GPA and rank weighting represent only part of the academic story. Emphasize academic achievements beyond these metrics, such as high scores on standardized tests (if submitted), participation in academic competitions, and independent research projects. A GPA is not the end-all-be-all of a potential candidate’s academic capabilities.
Effectively leveraging rank weighting on the Common Application requires a combination of accuracy, transparency, and strategic presentation. By understanding the high school’s policy, accurately reporting data, and highlighting academic achievements, students can enhance their application and present a comprehensive picture of their academic capabilities.
The next part offers a final summary of this report. This section highlights the key facets of rank weighting.
Conclusion
This exploration of “what does rank weighting mean on common app” reveals a system designed to acknowledge and quantify academic rigor. It demonstrates how high schools, in an effort to fairly represent student achievement, may assign different values to courses of varying difficulty. This weighting, when accurately communicated within the Common Application, provides colleges with a more nuanced understanding of an applicant’s academic journey. The impact, while potentially beneficial, is highly contextual, dependent on the specific policies of the applicant’s high school and the evaluation criteria of the receiving institution. Therefore, “what does rank weighting mean on common app” is more than a mere data point; it is a reflection of a complex interplay between curriculum, grading systems, and the competitive landscape of college admissions.
The informed applicant approaches the Common Application with a clear understanding of their high school’s grading practices and the implications of any rank weighting policies. While this article offered a thorough background into how rank weighting is used on common app, further research into other factors of the common app is always advised. This proactive engagement ensures an accurate and compelling presentation of academic qualifications. Furthermore, it is the best way to set yourself up for success in the admissions process.
